AI YouTube summarizers compared
Signal Extractor against the 16 tools people actually use to summarize YouTube videos — the big assistants, the browser extensions, the study apps and YouTube’s own AI. Feature by feature: what each one costs, where the free limits bite, whether you get clickable timestamps, and what happens on a video with no captions. Every page lists what the other tool does better too.

Signal Extractor vs ChatGPT
ChatGPT is a general-purpose assistant. It can't watch or listen to a video, so summarizing one means fetching the transcript and pasting it in yourself.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Gemini
Gemini takes a YouTube link directly and summarizes it free. It needs a Google account, works from the caption track, and answers in chat prose.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Claude
Claude can't open a YouTube link. It summarizes video beautifully once the transcript is in the chat — getting it there is the work.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Perplexity
Perplexity can summarize a video in YouTube Focus mode, but it caps the transcript it reads — so long videos come back summarized from the first stretch.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Ask YouTube
Ask YouTube is YouTube's own AI search. It answers questions across the whole catalogue rather than summarizing the one video in front of you.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs NotebookLM
NotebookLM is Google's research notebook. It reads YouTube captions as one source among many, and it's built for studying a whole topic rather than skimming one video.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Eightify
Eightify is a browser extension that turns a YouTube video into eight key ideas, with unlimited use behind a subscription.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Monica
Monica is an all-in-one AI assistant with a YouTube summarizer inside it. New accounts get two free summaries, then it's a subscription.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Sider
Sider is a browser sidebar assistant that does timestamped YouTube summaries, metered against a daily credit balance that doesn't roll over.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Glarity
Glarity is a free, ad-free extension that summarizes YouTube and translates the web. Free summaries are capped at roughly thirty minutes of video.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs NoteGPT
NoteGPT is a study tool that turns videos, PDFs and slides into summaries, mind maps and flashcards, on a monthly quota system.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Mindgrasp
Mindgrasp turns lectures, PDFs and videos into notes, flashcards and quizzes. The trials run three days and ask for a card.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Recall
Recall turns videos, podcasts and articles into a searchable personal knowledge base. The free plan covers ten AI summaries a month.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs HARPA AI
HARPA is a browser automation platform with a YouTube summary command. The free demo is 100 command runs in total, then it's priced in Megatokens.
Read the comparisonSignal Extractor vs summarize.tech
summarize.tech is the original paste-a-link YouTube summarizer: no login, a wall of running text, and a daily rate limit before a $10/month plan.
Read the comparison
Signal Extractor vs Glasp
Glasp's "YouTube Summary with ChatGPT & Claude" is a browser extension that drops a transcript and summary panel onto the YouTube page, capped at three summaries a day on the free plan.
Read the comparison